After having a fairly successful tenure at Wisconsin Coach Paul Chryst was fired his final season after starting 2-3 overall and 0-2 in conference. Luke Fickell has been at Wisconsin 3 years and had one successful season with guys that weren’t his recruits. Since then has steadily declined. His record this season so far is 2-5 and is 0-4 in conference. So what is the difference? With statistically much worse numbers why is Wisconsin keeping Fickell around? Money? Lack of wanting to take accountability?

░B░R░E░A░K░I░N░G ░B░R░E░A░ 🅱🆁🅴🅰🅺🅸🅽🅶 ░B░R░E░A░K░I░N░G

🅱🆁🅴🅰🅺🅸🅽🅶 ░B░R░E░A░K░I░N░G

 

The Wisconsin Question: Why Was Paul Chryst Fired, But Luke Fickell Is Still Standing?

 

When Wisconsin parted ways with Paul Chryst in 2022, the message from Madison was clear: the Badgers expected more. After years of consistency, competitiveness, and identity under Chryst, a 2–3 start—with losses to Washington State and Illinois—was deemed unacceptable. The program that once prided itself on blue-collar dominance, power running, and disciplined football wanted a “modernized” version of success. In came Luke Fickell, the highly regarded Cincinnati coach who took the Bearcats to the College Football Playoff—a first for a Group of Five school. He was hailed as the architect who would bring Wisconsin into a new era.

 

But three years later, that dream feels distant. Wisconsin sits at 2–5 overall and 0–4 in Big Ten play, a record worse than Chryst’s final year. Fans are restless, alumni are frustrated, and yet Fickell remains in charge. The question that hangs over Camp Randall like an autumn fog is simple: why is Luke Fickell still safe when Chryst wasn’t?

 

 

—

 

A Tale of Two Coaches

 

To understand the contrast, one must first appreciate what Paul Chryst accomplished—and how quickly it was forgotten. Between 2015 and 2021, Chryst led Wisconsin to a 67–26 record, including three Big Ten West titles and six bowl wins. His teams were known for toughness, defense, and the kind of run-heavy identity that defined the program for decades.

 

Yet in an era of NIL deals, high-octane offenses, and transfer portal chaos, some viewed Chryst’s approach as outdated. When the 2022 Badgers stumbled out of the gate, Athletic Director Chris McIntosh acted swiftly, firing Chryst just five games into the season. The decision shocked many—especially considering that Wisconsin’s two conference losses came against solid programs—but McIntosh’s message was one of ambition: Wisconsin would no longer settle for mediocrity.

 

Enter Luke Fickell—the hottest coaching hire of the offseason. His defensive acumen, recruiting reputation, and modern program-building at Cincinnati promised to rejuvenate Wisconsin football. Year one brought cautious optimism: an 8–5 finish and a bowl win, albeit with a roster largely built by Chryst and defensive coordinator Jim Leonhard.

 

But since then, the decline has been steady—and glaring.

 

 

—

 

The Decline Under Fickell

 

Fast forward to 2025, and Wisconsin football feels adrift. The offense, once a hallmark of efficiency, now lacks rhythm and identity. The defense, long the backbone of Badger football, has surrendered more yards and points than any Wisconsin unit in recent memory.

 

Fickell’s record this season—2–5 overall, 0–4 in Big Ten play—is not only disappointing; it’s historically poor. Wisconsin hasn’t seen this kind of futility since the pre-Barry Alvarez era. The line play has regressed, the quarterback situation remains unsettled, and the once-dominant run game has become inconsistent at best.

 

Even more concerning, the energy around the program has shifted. Once defined by unity and toughness, Wisconsin now looks uncertain and uninspired. Recruits are noticing. Fans are losing faith. And the same athletic department that fired a proven winner after a 2–3 start is now watching a 2–5 season unfold without a word.

 

 

—

 

So Why Is Fickell Still Here?

 

1. The Money Factor

The financial realities can’t be ignored. Luke Fickell signed a seven-year, $57 million deal—one of the richest in Big Ten history. Buying him out after just three seasons would be a monumental financial hit, especially for a university not known for bottomless athletic department pockets. When Chryst was fired, Wisconsin still owed him $11 million—a significant sum at the time. Doing the same to Fickell, with an even larger contract, may simply not be feasible.

 

2. The Excuse of “Rebuilding”

Unlike Chryst, Fickell can claim that he’s “building his own program.” The transition to his system, particularly with Phil Longo’s Air Raid-inspired offense, has been anything but smooth. Players recruited for power-running football are now being asked to run tempo-heavy spread schemes. Some within the program argue it’s unfair to judge Fickell too harshly until he’s had a full roster of his recruits. But patience wears thin when results keep sliding backward.

 

3. Accountability—or Lack Thereof

There’s also a question of leadership. Wisconsin’s administration made a bold, public statement when they ousted Chryst—it was an act of accountability, signaling higher standards. But firing Fickell so soon after hiring him would mean admitting a mistake at the highest level. It would reflect poorly not just on Fickell, but on Athletic Director Chris McIntosh himself. And that’s a level of accountability institutions often avoid.

 

 

—

 

A Program at a Crossroads

 

Wisconsin football stands at a delicate crossroads. The traditional power that once struck fear into Big Ten opponents now faces an identity crisis. Is it still the program of Jonathan Taylor, Melvin Gordon, and the great offensive lines of the past? Or is it trying to become something else entirely—something it isn’t built to be?

 

Fickell’s approach, while ambitious, hasn’t produced the results fans were promised. His teams lack the physical dominance Wisconsin was known for, yet haven’t developed the explosive passing attack modern programs use to compete. In trying to evolve, the Badgers have seemingly lost what made them special.

 

And as each week passes, the comparisons to Chryst grow louder. He was fired for less. He won more. His teams never looked this disorganized or uninspired. The contrast is unavoidable—and uncomfortable.

 

 

—

 

What Comes Next?

 

If Wisconsin’s slide continues, the administration will face pressure from all sides—fans, boosters, and former players who still bleed red and white. Patience is a virtue, but college football is a results business. And when results look this bleak, even seven-year contracts don’t guarantee safety.

 

At some point, Fickell must show tangible progress—something to justify the faith (and money) Wisconsin invested in him. If not, the program risks years of mediocrity, or worse, irrelevance in an expanding Big Ten where Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State, and now Oregon and Washington dominate the headlines.

 

For now, though, the silence from Madison is deafening. No statements. No panic moves. Just a fan base watching history repeat itself—with a twist. The man once hired to lead Wisconsin to the next level is overseeing its steepest decline in decades.

 

So, what’s the difference between Paul Chryst and Luke Fickell?

Maybe it’s not about performance anymore. Maybe it’s about money, ego, and accountability—three forces that often dictate college football’s biggest decisions.

 

And until Wisconsin confronts those truths, C

amp Randall may keep echoing with frustration instead of “Jump Around.”